Track measures real progress against plan, not a number someone typed into a sheet, but completion rolled up from every unit, floor and tower, mapped onto the model. So planned vs actual is a fact, not a feeling.
Track structures the project the way it's actually built, by location and by work, then measures progress at the smallest unit and rolls it all the way up.
Project → tower → floor → unit → space. Track follows the location breakdown, so progress is grounded in real, physical work, not a project-level percentage.
A work breakdown of activity groups and activities maps onto every location. Define the structure once; Track applies it across every matching unit and tower.
Activity → group → unit → floor → tower → project. Progress aggregates as you go, so every level shows a number you can stand behind.
Track paints actual progress straight onto the model, colour-coded against plan. Ahead, on track, at risk, behind, visible at a glance, location by location, so a slip in one tower never hides inside a healthy project average.
Track reads your model and programme from Autodesk Forma, no parallel system to maintain. As your stack grows, Track grows with it.
Track structures your project the way it's actually built and measures progress at the smallest unit.
Measure completion at the unit, floor, and tower level — tied to real physical work, not guesses.
Color-code building models automatically based on completion metrics, task status, or crew performance.
Activity → group → unit → floor → tower → project. Every level shows a number you can stand behind.
Automated rollups of task delays, responsiveness, and completion quality per crew.